Our website would like to use cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.

Login or Register

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
 
Re: Stonehenge and Sidbury again
by Simon at 12:11 07/05/08 (Blogs::Simon)
The intro to that article's a bit confused :-)

It talks about a 'solstice' alignment and 'east-west' streets (which would imply equinotial solar alignment, not solstitial).

Actually the streets aren't oriented due E-W in any case.

Washington's more interesting in my view, because there are a number of alignments that are designed to be astronically-based. They're there as part of the masonic heritage of that city.

One of the most obvious is the equinox alignment for the Washington Monument and Lincoln Memorial, but there are others related to the constellation Virgo.
--
simon

<< How many houses could you fit ... Cretins damage Stonehenge >>
View Comments (Flat Mode) Printer Version
Stonehenge and Sidbury again There is an attachment here Simon - 6/05
    Re: Stonehenge and Sidbury aga... David Crowson - 7/05
       Re: Stonehenge and Sidbury aga... Simon - 7/05
       - Deleted User Account - 8/05
    - Deleted User Account - 8/05