Our website would like to use cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.

Login or Register

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Re: Multi-Valued Data Fields ..Spawn of Satan ?
by Hugo van der Sanden at 14:30 18/07/06 (Blogs::Dave)
Interesting - I have for a while been planning to do exactly the same within Novacaster, to add support for an object to have a "collection" field inside it (supporting set, bag and maybe ordered set and array) which would be implemented as multiple tables under the hood.

The main value from my point of view is that this can be used to reduce code complexity, and thus (hopefully) to reduce both development and maintenance costs. I do understand that this should be used sparingly though - the primary target is for client-specific custom objects, which want to have the supporting code as small and localised as possible. This is fresh in my mind, because a potential new client we talked to yesterday appears to have precisely this requirement.

This is only for the object view though - the 'relational' side of the object-relational mapping will not have its view restricted, so full access to the underlying tables will be maintained.


<< 200 miles to the nearest ocean Funding Issues >>
View Comments (Flat Mode) Printer Version
Multi-Valued Data Fields ..Spa... David Crowson - 18/07
    Re: Multi-Valued Data Fields .... Bruce Ure - 18/07
       Re: Multi-Valued Data Fields .... Bruce Ure - 18/07
          Re: Multi-Valued Data Fields .... Simon - 18/07
    Re: Multi-Valued Data Fields .... Hugo van der Sanden - 18/07
    Re: Multi-Valued Data Fields .... Jonathan Tuppeny - 18/07
       Re: Multi-Valued Data Fields .... Gordon Hundley - 21/07